SCREEN > REVIEWS

Food Inc.

By Matt Prigge
Add Comment Add Comment | Comments: 1 | Posted Jun. 16, 2009

Fast Food Nation scribe Eric Schlosser is all over the food- industry doc Food, Inc.—a sign that filmmaker Robert Kenner is on the right track but also that we’ve done this before.

Indeed, the problem with this terrifying and well-researched scarefest isn’t intellectual but practical. It’s either redundant or inferior, depending on how you see it. In other words, either you’re getting, in a scant 93 minutes, shafted on plenty more information available elsewhere, or you’re simply watching a bloated advertisement for Fast Food Nation, as well as Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemna, both of which benefit from being thorough. In any case, pick up a book.

There’s little use denying the potency of Food, Inc.’s chosen topic, however. Aided by Schlosser and Pollan as talking heads, director Kenner provides context and calm terror in an age when even the First Lady is planting an organic garden. Amid this green utopia, Kenner’s film depicts a Baudrillardian underworld, where corporations have seized (nearly) every last inch of our food intake, and thereby our lives, without us realizing or caring.

In short, a mere few corporations control access to all our food, putting farmers out to pasture even as their products are sold with images of agrarian heaven. Supermarkets promote the “illusion of diversity,” as one puts it, but it’s all the same couple products, most of them a bastardization of corn. (For more, see the more focused doc King Corn.) Throw in underpaid and poorly treated workers and the fall of the FDA under the last administration, and you’ve got food scares galore, though the infamous Jack in the Box e. coli incident did, for the record, occur on Clinton’s watch.

As a stand-alone product, Food, Inc. is a bone-chilling (to say the least) vision, and is well-structured and presented. But it also wants to be a beacon of information, and dispensing exposition just isn’t cinema’s strength. As with (to name just one) No End in Sight, Food, Inc. can’t help but feel subservient to the tomes that not only inspired its existence but even fuel it. Kenner would’ve had better luck following King Corn’s lead in zeroing in on a specific gripe and attacking from the micro rather than the macro level. As such, Food, Inc. is worthwhile but superfluous. B-

Add to favoritesAdd to Favorites PrintPrint Send to friendSend to Friend

COMMENTS

Comments 1 - 1 of 1
Report Violation

1. Marcos said... on Jul 1, 2009 at 12:24AM

“There are FDA proceedings underway to review the use of acetaminophen in a wide range of products. Acetaminophen is a mild pain reliever, used worldwide under several different trade names, most common being Tylenol. It is also present in cough and cold syrups. However, evidence is beginning to surface that acetaminophen takes a heavy toll on the human liver, and is thought to be one of the leading causes of liver failure, which takes a lot of quick cash to treat. The FDA is mulling a ban of any acetaminophen products other than pain relievers, and people are calling for a bigger warning and package redesign, which means Big Pharma might need unsecured loans to deal with acetaminophen revenue losses.”

ADD COMMENT

Rate:
(HTML and URLs prohibited)