Grade: B-
Far more interesting than anything associated with Everybody Loves Raymond deserves to be, the doc Exporting Raymond broaches a largely untapped subject. Hot on the heels of successful versions of The Nanny in Russia, Indonesia and Argentina, Philip Rosenthal, Raymond’s comfortably nebbish producer, is sent to the former USSR to oversee a Russian remake of his monster hit. Turns out long suffering male figureheads with nagging wives, batty elders and spunky runts really are universal, but then comes an unexpected cultural blockade: Russian sitcoms never moved past barndoor broad, pratfall-heavy tomfoolery. This leaves the evolved comedy of Raymond, based upon a foundation of recognizable mundanity, looking positively alien. Were you even aware Everybody Loves Raymond had “evolved comedy?” No one, from exec to actor, understands what’s funny about an entire episode revolving around vacation luggage no one ones wants to carry up to the bedroom, or a scene about a potentially unfresh bottle of juice. And Raymond? No Russian patriarch would be such a weakling. Awkward rehearsals lead to shoots played to an audience of stone faces, and soon not even Rosenthal is laughing at the jokes he once wrote.
Initially it appears Rosenthal’s motivation for lugging along a camera crew was primarily so he could crack one-liners and make light of Russia’s cultural differences (what a country!). Indeed, much of Exporting Raymond, which Rosenthal also directed, plays like an audition tape for his new career in front of cameras—an onanistic valentine to the wit and wisdom of the real Everybody Loves Raymond. But he also deserves enormous credit for throwing himself fearlessly into the issues that crop up. It’s entirely possible for this quest to end in failure, and Rosenthal presents each problem with candor, even recognizing at one point that his endless criticisms and suggestions to his Russian cowoerks have led to him receiving the silent treatment. Exporting Raymond winds up doubling as a documentary that’s actually entertaining and a fairly serious—if never serious—inquiry into how important a region’s culture informs comedy. It’s almost enough to convince skeptics that actual episodes of Everybody Loves Raymond share a similar incisiveness.
Article:
Time is the Enemy in Assayas' Autobiographical "Something in the Air"
Article:
The Sprawling "Midnight’s Children" Goes in Too Many Directions
Article:
Neil Barsky’s "Koch" Keeps It Light
Article:
"The Manson Family" Still a Bloody Mess, 10 Years Later
Article:
In "Admission," Tina Fey Plus Paul Rudd Equals Dud
Article:
The Clever "Warm Bodies" Bites, Bruises Teen Romance Thrillers
Article:
"Stand Up Guys" Saved By its Trio of Masters
Article:
Oscar-Nominated Live Action Short Films Long on Lessons
1. Keith Talent said... on Apr 28, 2011 at 02:47PM
“Wow, how did Matt Prigge get work as a pro critic? He's a very poor writer. Perhaps the more pertinent question is, was the PW copy editor asleep?
"Comfortably nebbish" — no, Matt, "nebbish" is a noun, not an adjective. You may as well have written "comfortably nerd."
"Inquiry into how important a region's culture informs comedy" — uh, what? What were you even trying to say here? Perhaps you meant something like "inquiry into how regional culture informs comedy." Why is the phrase "how important" hanging out in the middle, there? You could use the "important" idea in some different version of this sentence, perhaps, e.g. "...inquiry into the importance of regional culture in comedy," or something like that. As it stands in your review, the phrase is utterly meaningless.”
2. Anonymous said... on Apr 28, 2011 at 02:50PM
“On top of the blatant examples of bad writing listed above, there's also an ignorant attitude of condescension towards "Everybody Loves Raymond," a show that is widely regarded as one of TV's best traditional multi-camera sitcoms. Prigge makes the inexplicable assumption that "Raymond" is a dumb piece of crap and expects his audience to share this bizarre opinion, without providing any argument to support it.”