Can split trigger due-on-sale clause?
Can split trigger due-on-sale clause?
DEAR BENNY: My wife and I are in the process of getting a divorce. I am prepared to give her the family home so that our children will not be disrupted any more than they already are. I know that our mortgage lender will not relieve me of our joint obligation to make the monthly payments, but hopefully that will not be a financial problem for us. We have been advised that a lender can use the "due on sale" clause in the mortgage documents to block this transaction. Can this happen? --Tom
DEAR TOM: The short answer is no. Federal law permits certain real estate transfers even though the loan documents contain the "due on sale" clause.
Let's look at this concept. Mortgage lenders are in the business of making money, and obviously they do not like to allow people to assume a low interest rate when rates are much higher. While this scenario sounds unlikely in today's marketplace, many readers will recall the excessively high mortgage interest rates during the past decade.
Thus, many years ago, the mortgage industry came up with the concept of "due on sale." Most mortgage loan documents contain language to the effect that if property that is secured by a mortgage is sold or transferred without the lender's prior written consent, the lender has the right to call the entire mortgage due, and insist on payment in full. This is known as the "due on sale" clause.
There has been much litigation over this concept throughout the country, and the great majority of the court cases have upheld the lender's right to enforce the due-on-sale concept. In 1982, however, Congress enacted the Garn-St. Germain Act (12 UCA 1701j-3), which imposed certain restrictions on the enforcement of this clause.
This law contained nine specific exemptions where a lender was not permitted to exercise its option pursuant to a due-on-sale clause. When there is a real property loan secured by a lien on residential real property containing fewer than five dwelling units -- including a lien on the stock of a cooperative housing corporation or a residential manufactured home -- a lender cannot enforce the due-on-sale clause under the following circumstances:
I highlighted your situation by listing it first on the list. Clearly, if you and your spouse enter into a formal, legal separation agreement, or actually have a court order granting a divorce -- which contains language reflecting the house transfer -- you are protected under the law and the lender cannot exercise the due-on-sale clause, which I suspect is contained in your mortgage documents,
However, here are some suggestions before you proceed to transfer the property to your wife:
First, before the divorce is finalized, arrange to transfer the house. Normally, when real property is sold or transferred, there is a transfer and recordation tax that has to be paid to the local jurisdiction.
For example, in the District of Columbia, where I practice law, if the property is appraised at more than $400,000, the local government will want to collect 2.9 percent of the appraised price. Normally, if you sell to a third party, each side will split these costs, paying 1.45 percent. (If the property is worth less than $400,000, the taxes are lowered to 1.1 percent each).
However, if you are married and transfer the property to your spouse, you do not have to pay either of these taxes. You pay only a nominal fee to record the deed -- usually less than $30.
So discuss this with your attorney and arrange to transfer the property before the divorce decree becomes final.
Second, what is your current mortgage interest rate? Rates are quite low today, so you might want to consider refinancing first, so as to take advantage of that lower rate. After that, you can have the property transferred to your wife. You will, of course, have to explain your pending divorce situation to the lender, but if you can qualify, there could be substantial monthly savings.
Finally, I strongly recommend that you advise your lender of your plans. Legally, it has no legal right to contest your decision, but it always makes sense to keep lenders informed before you take any steps to change the ownership.
DEAR BENNY: My family and I have lived in our current home for seven years. Do we qualify for the $6,500 tax credit for existing homeowners if we purchase a replacement principal residence? If so, please tell me where to find in the Internal Revenue Service regulations to file for it. --Don
DEAR DON: Last year, Congress expanded the tax credits available to homebuyers. The new law allows existing homeowners to buy a new house -- not to exceed $800,000 -- and so long as they owned and lived in their current home for at least five consecutive years out of eight years prior to the purchase date of the new home.
Real estate market recap, July 27-31
What's Your Home Worth?
3-D home of the day