Imagine a new mortgage model

Transparent pricing may be tough sell for lenders, brokers

By Inman News Feed
Add Comment Add Comment | Comments: 0 | Posted Nov. 22, 2010

Share this Story:

Transparent pricing may be tough sell for lenders, brokers

Jack Guttentag
Inman News

Mortgage brokers are an endangered species. Before the financial crisis, they touched almost three of every four new mortgages. Today, it is closer to one of four, and still declining.

The causes are many and include the post-crisis swing to FHA loans, which many brokers aren't eligible to handle, and new disclosure and licensing regulations that put brokers at a disadvantage. In addition, their public esteem and political clout have suffered from the bad press associated with their role in the market frenzy that preceded the financial crisis.

To some degree, brokers have gotten a bum rap, since they had nothing to do with the erosion of underwriting standards that paved the way for the crisis. However, they were eager participants who profited from the frenzy, and their pricing policies have long been suspect.

Many observers say, "Good riddance," but I don't share that view. Aside from dysfunctional pricing, which can be remedied (see below), mortgage brokerage is the quintessential small business, offering attractive opportunities to energetic self-starters who like to be their own bosses and reap the full rewards of their own efforts.

Furthermore, mortgage brokers and the independent wholesale lenders that service them are a competitive counterweight to the few mega-retail banks that now dominate the post-crisis mortgage market. For this reason alone, we need brokers now more than ever.

Dysfunctional pricing has played a major role in the industry's loss of public esteem. Lenders deliver wholesale prices to brokers who add markups before quoting retail prices to borrowers.

Lenders do not publicly disclose their wholesale prices. With the exception of Upfront Mortgage Brokers, brokers don't disclose them either, because that would be tantamount to disclosing their markups, which most brokers view as nobody's business but theirs.

This is a system of concealment that allows brokers to price opportunistically, charging what they think the borrower might be willing to pay. The concealment system breeds distrust. The industry will never regain its good standing in the market until it replaces this system of concealment with a system of transparency.

A transparent pricing system requires full participation by wholesale lenders as well as brokers. Under a transparent system, wholesale lenders quote retail prices available to borrowers through brokers. These prices are public information, and the lenders can advertise them and disclose them on their websites, just as retail lenders do.

The only difference is that the mortgages advertised by the wholesale lenders are available only through brokers. Borrowers who seek a price posted by a wholesale lender know that they can obtain that price from any broker dealing with that lender.

In the transparent system, the broker is paid by the lender and has no control whatsoever over the mortgage price. Brokers compete in terms of service, reputation, personality, expertise, sex appeal -- anything but price.

Lenders will develop standardized pricing formulas for compensating brokers. The broker can also charge the borrower, but the charge is disclosed at their first meeting, before the borrower is committed.

The broker in a transparent pricing system is not in a conflict situation with the borrower, as is the case in a concealment system. This largely eliminates distrust. It also ends needless and time-consuming shopping by borrowers, who flit from one broker to another looking for a better price, not realizing that the broker quoting the lowest price may have no intention of delivering it.

Brokers will make less on each loan in a transparent system, but they will do more loans because they will waste less time on deals that don't close. Lenders will be able to market directly to borrowers, and will no longer be vulnerable to lawsuits from borrowers who were grossly overcharged by predatory brokers.

These benefits of a transparent system are not hypothetical. Such systems exist in Canada, the U.K. and Ireland, whereas to my knowledge, the U.S. is the only country in the world that uses a system of concealment.

I wrote an article about the U.K. system in 2008, and reported that the fees paid to brokers there were less than half as large as those in the U.S. In the U.K., furthermore, brokers are relationship-oriented, because with price out of the picture, establishing a relationship with the borrower is a strategy for getting referrals and repeat business.

In the U.S., brokers who look to make as much as they can on every deal are by definition transaction-oriented. The few who are not, including Upfront Mortgage Brokers (UMBs) -- members of an association that I helped to create -- standardize their pricing and disclose it. They practice transparency within a concealment system.

Page: 1 2 |Next
Add to favoritesAdd to Favorites PrintPrint Send to friendSend to Friend



(HTML and URLs prohibited)