LGBTQ Book Banned in Jersey High School. Uh Oh.

By Randy LoBasso
Add Comment Add Comment | Comments: 4 | Posted May. 6, 2010

Share this Story:

Members of a Burlington County, N.J, conservative group who call themselves 9.12 have successfully banned Revolutionary Voices: A Multicultural Queer Youth Anthology from a high school’s library due to its homosexual content. And the men and women of the group have their sites set on more districts.

Some background: The 9.12 Project was a concoction of television and stage actor Glenn Beck. When constructing the idea, he said he just wished all Americans could feel as they did the day after 9/11—patriotic, we suppose; or, more likely: fearful, angry, ready to believe dubious lies. The 9/11 connection for his scheme is strange coming from Beck, who has stated he hates the victims of 9/11 as much as he despises those of Hurricane Katrina (the latter of which are “scumbags,” according to Beck.)

The 9.12 Project consists of nine principles and 12 values that helped Beck rise to superstardom after being a Republican—as his character was until Barack Obama was elected president—wasn’t cool anymore (now he’s a chalk-board constitutionalist, or something). One of the principles is: “I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life.” One of the values: “Hope.” 

In spite of shunning those who don’t necessarily worship God and misleading others who may be coping with homosexual thoughts at a young age, the group says its actions will help unite the United States. They’re sort of like the Tea Patriots, except their existence is solely due to a former Top-40 DJ, not suddenly hating taxes or believing President Obama is a space alien—though that’s implied.

Parents, teachers and librarians “at Tuesday night's meeting criticized the school board for bowing to special interests,” according to the Inquirer. Librarian Dee Venuto said: “It would be convenient if we could look at these books and simply discuss whether or not they are obscene. However, we cannot overlook that the motivation behind the request to remove these titles has other social and political implications.”

The book was banned at Rancocas Valley Regional High School.

The Inquirer has also found, "[The 9.12 Group is] already looking at petitioning the removal of the same book from the Lenape Regional High School District, which with four high schools and about 7,500 students is the county's largest school district.

"Lenape Superintendent Emily Capella said members of the group had addressed the school board last week but had yet to file a petition."

Revolutionary Voices been under fire by the right since its publication in 2000 due to its place on the library association’s list of appropriate books dealing with teenage sexuality. Not unlike many conservative policies and conspiracy theories, banning this specific book gained traction through mass emails and websites masquerading as news.

For example, Mission: America’s Linda P. Harvey has written an article detailing why this particular book is wrong on its website’s “Fighting the Gay Agenda in Schools” tab. Harvey uses a young girl’s example of coming out at a young age, written in the pages of Revolutionary Voices, as an example to shun the book (she despises many others published by the same company, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays).

The site states, “No biological cause for homosexual or gender-variant desires or behavior has been found in humans. Claims to the contrary are founded on wishful thinking, not scientific fact. There is much evidence that homosexual desire and identity develops, although usually not consciously, out of one's life experiences. Child sexual abuse is frequently a factor.” Another one of the site’s supposed facts: “All major world religions and civilizations have historically condemned the practice of homosexuality. Nothing that is now known changes the reasons for that heritage of disapproval….Finding homosexuality repulsive is a natural human instinct to protect oneself, and is common to most humans.”

The sources for these conclusions often come from the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, a group that helps individuals deal with “unwanted homosexual attraction” and receive “psychological care,” to stop that attraction—because that always works. NARTH is unsurprisingly affiliated with Mission: America and in a sign of possible book bans to come, the group will be holding their 2010 convention on Nov. 5, 6 and 7 at the Renaissance Philadelphia Hotel.

According to the Inky: The Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, a national civil-rights group that represents gays, lesbians and people with HIV/AIDS, and which has successfully litigated against school districts in the past, is assessing the situation, said Hayley Gorenberg, deputy legal director.

"The fact that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender material is being singled out "is very concerning," she said.

Add to favoritesAdd to Favorites PrintPrint Send to friendSend to Friend

COMMENTS

Comments 1 - 4 of 4
Report Violation

1. homophobic assholes said... on May 6, 2010 at 10:36PM

“"Finding homosexuality repulsive is a natural human instinct to protect oneself, and is common to most humans." fuck these people. who the fuck do they think they are?! this is hate speech and should not be tolerated. every citizen of new jersey should be freaking out over this act of intolerance.”

Report Violation

2. Anonymous said... on May 7, 2010 at 02:52PM

“Ah, NARTH. Here's hoping the Dr. Rekers story shuts that clown college down for good.”

Report Violation

3. Anonymous said... on May 7, 2010 at 02:52PM

“Ah, NARTH. Here's hoping the Dr. Rekers story shuts that clown college down for good.”

Report Violation

4. Anonymous said... on May 10, 2010 at 10:15AM

“All you have to do is read some of the speeches from
Nazi Germany. How soon people forget about the hate for others
that was displayed then and now. Shame on them”

ADD COMMENT

Rate:
(HTML and URLs prohibited)

Related Content

Conservatives and gay marriage
By Joel

I’ve been wrestling this afternoon with how to respond to National Review’s editorial that is dismissive of efforts to extend marriage to gay couples. This passage in particular has vexed me: Few social goods will come from recognizing same-sex couples as married. Some practical benefits may accrue to the couples, but most of them could easily [...]

Related Content

Why Philly needs gay marriage
By Joel

I’ve been surprised, since moving to Philly, that a lot of the pro-gay-marriage activism in this city has been focused almost entirely on California and Proposition 8. Maybe I’m missing stuff - I don’t hob-nob with Philly’s gay activists - but that’s kind of weird to me. Philly’s relatively gay-friendly, from what I can tell, [...]

Related Content

Despair, gay marriage and Maggie Gallagher
By Joel Mathis

I haven’t been able to let go of this post by Maggie Gallagher, who runs the National Organization for Marriage, which campaigns against gay marriage, including the recent ballot in Maine. She wrote on Friday: Despair is a spiritual weapon, and it is the gay-marriage movement’s single most powerful weapon. Even accounting for differing political views, this [...]

Related Content

Conservative Agenda Coming to Philly Soon
By Randy LoBasso

An anthology for LGBT and questioning youth is banned in Burlington County, N.J., public libraries. What's next for the 9.12 Project and other right-wing groups?