Free Spirits: A Call to Kill the PA Liquor Control Board

Wine School owner, demanding privatization of PA’s booze, calls out the PLCB.

By Randy LoBasso
Add Comment Add Comment | Comments: 13 | Posted Feb. 16, 2011

Share this Story:

But for now, there’s just wine kiosks.

Prev| Page: 1 2
Add to favoritesAdd to Favorites PrintPrint Send to friendSend to Friend

COMMENTS

Comments 1 - 13 of 13
Report Violation

1. JasonP said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 09:37AM

“Wine drinkers are snobby shits, but I like this guy. Who'd guess he had brass balls?”

Report Violation

2. Anonymous said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 11:50AM

“calling the Wine School of Philadelphia "the only school if it's kind in Pennsylvania" is just silly.

WSET classes (the internationally recognized certification in wine education; the Wine School is not accreditated with anyone except itself) are offered in Philadelphia, and throughout the state.”

Report Violation

3. Ted said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 12:13PM

“I will wait to see the details. Unfortunately, Corbett is so tied to his donors that my guess is we will end up with a very tight, no shipping, three-tier state system. It will be private but with the possibility of even higher prices. Regardless - the existing system needs to be dumped.

The best case would be PA ends up as an "open," reciprocal state like NY. This would also greatly help the in-state wineries. We could actually get a wine culture in PA. It will help the restaurants. They will have more access to wines at more reasonable prices. It will add jobs when the wine shoppes open.

Bravo to Keith for this one!!”

Report Violation

4. Anonymous said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 12:39PM

“Actually, WSET doesn't have any level of certification. That is just plain bullshit. The Wine School runs professional certification exams out of California. Didn't know that did you?

Comparing the too is silly. You have that right, anonymous. WSET is offered on a part time basis out of rented rooms. The Wine School employs a full time staff, has an actual brick-and-mortar school, and actually works for the benefit of the community at large. The WSET does nothing of the kind.

It's clear from the scope of this article that Keith is sticking his head out for both consumers and the wine trade. Instead of knocking him, maybe Neil Ewing and his clique at WSET should throw their support to the one guy who is willing to take a stand?

From what i have read and heard, this WSET clique has been making the same complaints about Keith and the Wine School for a decade now. It's time to grow up and accept that Keith is doing something great for this town- even if you don't like the guy”

Report Violation

5. KeithWallace said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 12:44PM

“Hey, thanks for the support! As for the upcoming flame war between WSET and Wine School supporters, lets just end it here, okay?”

Report Violation

6. LewBryson said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 12:58PM

“Yeah, what he said, mostly, except that while Auditor General Jack Wagner didn't find a legal conflict of interest on the "courtesy contract" bid under state law, he DID say: "Although this contract was awarded according to the letter of the law, there are several incidents that occurred that raise serious concerns and put the PLCB's procurement procedures in question." And quoting from a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story, Wagner also noted "training to improve employee courtesy, manners and product knowledge wasn't a worthwhile expense. At the least, he said, it should have been done in-house."
Wagner's on-board, but he can only go by the law. And that's kind of where the PLCB is: I despise the state-run stores, but the PLCB's continual defense that they can only do what's legal under the Liquor Code is absolutely true. It's the Legislature that needs to make this happen, and I'd hate to see this be done without input from US, the people who buy and drink the stuff.”

Report Violation

7. KeithWallace said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 01:12PM

“Very good points, Lew.

I agree that the most important and most difficult bit is to make sure the consumer isn't left out.”

Report Violation

8. Ted (again) said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 01:51PM

“Best thing we, as consumers, can do is set up our own PAC, raise some money, and wave it in the face of the legislators. This is the only "currency" they understand. Trader Joe's, Costco, Rite-aid, etc will contribute.

This is a Free the Grapes movement and moment for our state. We need to stay on top of the hearings and whatever piece of legislation winds its way through our fine system.”

Report Violation

9. Will said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 02:11PM

“All the wine snobs that want to get rid of the state's stores had better get ready for higher prices and higher taxes, because that's what all of us will end up with if the private sector takes over. Think about it for a minute. When we get finished sending all the profits out of state to Walmart and Target, what will the genuses in Harrisburg do to make up the difference? And do you know that the pro-selling people in Harrisburg want to change the structure to get rid of some of the taxes. That means other taxes will have to go up, because in case you didn't notice, we have a $4 billion deficit. Do you think that after privatization Big Alcohol and its lobbyests will allow taxes on their products to be raised? No way.”

Report Violation

10. albert Brooks said... on Feb 16, 2011 at 03:42PM

“It is apparent that Will hasn't read the proposal and is only mouthing the talking points of the union.”

Report Violation

11. Anonymous said... on Feb 17, 2011 at 04:17AM

“Will, it's deliciously ironic you misspelled "geniuses." Keith Wallace is a loud-mouthed malcontent, but he always has the consumer in mind when going to war against the PLCB. You have to respect that. It's a much better stance than Ewing and Marnie Old who spend more time comparing dick size and suing people than educating the masses and going to bat for those of us who want better selection, more QA, and consistency in our wine and liquor stores. While Wallace, Old, and Ewing are blessed with the same knowledge, but not cut from the same cloth. We really could use some effort and outspoken opinion from the other two in support of us.”

Report Violation

12. Il Vecchio said... on Feb 19, 2011 at 11:45AM

“Why do people post anonymously? Do they lack the balls to stand behind their comments...the original anonymous poster (Neil?) has an obvious reading disability. The article calls the Wine School ";;;the only one OF ITS KIND...''. It is not and never has been, thankfully, the dry power point presentation offered up by Ewing and the academically oriented WSET program. You want accreditation sans substance, go to WSET. You want to actually learn about wine from the vine to the glass, go to the Wine School. And to posit that Ewing and Old have the same depth of knowledge as Wallace..well, are either of them an alumnus of U-Cal Davis, worked as a winemaker, or been consultants to winemakers in Europe and America?”

Report Violation

13. J. said... on Feb 27, 2011 at 11:14PM

“i hope this jackass feels good about supporting the campaign of our new Governor Tom Corbett, solely because his single-issue stance about the privatization of the PLCB, when 42,000 people are going to lose their health coverage tomorrow.
maybe the kind of people who can drop this kind of money to act sophisticated with their newfound wine knowledge won't be impacted by the policies this new administration will implement, but thousands of other people (who don't give a shit about wine) are going to have their lives made much more difficult.
but hey, at least he can get that bottle of Bordeaux he's been coveting.
enjoy your new digs in Rittenhouse.
get the hell out of my neighborhood.”

ADD COMMENT

Rate:
(HTML and URLs prohibited)