Good thing these people aren't gun owners.
No parking zone: Fairmount's dog owners are locked out for now.
Last week someone emailed me a video of a CBS News segment about Philadelphia homicides. A reporter went to North Philly and talked to a community activist, who was understandably pissed off. He then talked to Sylvester Johnson, who seemed both hopeless and disaffected. Once again I thought the three words I always think when people kill each other or the Phillies lose: "My poor city."
How embarrassing. "My poor city." What a pompous loser. Yet I feel the city's pain. I suffer over it.
My psychiatrist explained to me recently that I'm an absorber. Other people's feelings adhere to me. I'm like tape. Sadness, pain, shame--if it's happening to someone else and I get wind of it, it's happening to me too.
Being an absorber (which sort of sounds like being a diaper) makes me overly dramatic about Philadelphia. I'm like Edith Piaf: short, disturbed, and weeping as I sing "La 215 en Rose."
But not all is murder and mayhem. In Fairmount, on streets abutting Eastern State Penitentiary, there's a different kind of war being fought. I found out about it from Rachel Crowl, formerly of PW, who sent me a photo of her dog standing, forlorn, in front of a closed neighborhood dog park.
I immediately absorbed. Suddenly it was me standing outside the park, a leash tight and itchy around my neck, desperate to go to the one place that felt like freedom. I felt sticky with the injustice of it all. "Why?" I screamed inside my weimaraner self.
As a former dog owner, I know that if your dog isn't tiny and neurotic, as all of mine have been, it's a pleasure for them to run around and play with other dogs. So why the closure?
Deep breath: Some people liked the dog park, and some people called it a nuisance, and no one could agree for years--yes, years. So finally the people who didn't like it filed a lawsuit and temporarily won, but the people who did like it have a lawyer, and it's going back to court. In the meantime the dog owners are having a protest, and the doggie dissenters say they're fighting "a defensive war," and people are angry at each other, and the dogs have no idea what the hell is going on.
Neither do I.
So I looked at the related thread on PhillyBlog.com. And my powers to empathize, to absorb, deserted me. The thread was like kryptonite.
Apparently, these ostensibly reasonable people--mild-mannered dog owners in favor of a dog park, and mild-mannered neighbors sick of hearing dogs bark--include a subset of people who, when provoked, go completely insane.
The first thing I noticed was the vitriol directed against Ralph Cipriano, the plaintiff in the original suit to close the dog park. This being Philadelphia, I know Cipriano. He's written for PW.
The posts about him slam him for being "a failure" because he got "fired" from the Inquirer. That's when my anti-absorption Spidey sense started tingling.
Saying merely that Cipriano got fired is a willful misunderstanding of his case. In fact, the Inquirer was ultimately forced to issue a public apology and settle Cipriano's libel case against them for an undisclosed sum that was posh enough that he could subsequently freelance for alt-weeklies. Do a Google search for "Cipriano" and "Inquirer," and you'll see how easily the full story is gleaned.
There are also allegations that Cipriano has a network of spies, and is having people followed. One poster, Bill Z, says Cipriano "makes me embarrassed to be Italian," and requests a digital photo of Cipriano along with his address so "I can give this loser the publicity he deserves."
Referring to the followers Cipriano supposedly enlisted, Buttercup10 writes: "Im pretty sure, but don't quote me on this [too late], that these people are using this experience as a practice run for the beginning of their careers as lookouts and runners for drug dealers who will soon be doing business in the dog park."
So Cipriano is starting a drug-dealing ring? It's too much.
I called Cipriano, who says yes, he filed the lawsuit, and yes, he thinks it's justified, though he also thinks it's all pretty silly. As for the allegations against him, he claims he's being harassed--that someone left a pile of dog poo on his porch, people are having dogs piss on his steps, and dog parkers are calling him and his wife Nazis.
The dog parkers say someone on the opposing side took a crowbar to the benches at the dog park, so that even if the dog walkers wanted to break the law and go around the police tape, there'd be nowhere for them to sit.
Article:
Puppets, Politics and All The Rest
Article:
Letters: 'Precious' Moments
Article:
TWU Strikes Again
Article:
Intervention III: Harm Reduction
Article:
Bartenders Hate You
Article:
Absinthe Cocktail Recipes from Philly Bartenders
Article:
PW's Guide to Hangover Cures
Article:
Philly's Top 15 Drinks
1. dogstories said... on Jun 2, 2008 at 06:58AM
“Fairmount is a true dog loving and accomodating community; in our opinion it is one of the best the city has to offer despite the Dog Pen controversy described in this article. There are (and were at the time this controversy was at its height) many other suitable locales in the neighborhood to gather with dogs given that one of the neighborhood's quality amenities is its proximity to Fairmount Park. Many viewpoints are not registered here or on the Philly blog posts to which this article refers. Our experience as intermittent Dog Pen users was mixed. We found that the use of the Dog Pen by commercial dog walking services, dogs that were not fixed, and unsupervised children made it an unsuitable spot much of the time for our dogs. However, we are grateful for the wonderful friends we and our dogs made during our visits there. Two of the post-controversy impacts are the eyesore of a gated, overgrown patch that used to be the Dog Pen and the undeserved stigma for residents of being at the geographic center of the controversy. We hope that progress can be made to address those outcomes in the future.”