The 2012 Election Issue: It's PW's Binder Full of Women!

By PW Staff
Add Comment Add Comment | Comments: 6 | Posted Oct. 31, 2012

Share this Story:

Chick-flick politics. That’s what women want!

Sorry, son. Some of us dig a good knock-down-drag-out for a good cause. And the 2012 elections represent that.

The nationwide effort to hijack the vote via phony arguments for photo ID has been as grating as a bad bunion. But the tired convictions that women are mere vessels for progeny and not qualified to determine what happens to their own bodies being trotted out this cycle? They’ve left me screaming more times than I care to count.

I’ve never heard of a piece of legislation being offered and passing a chamber of the U.S. Congress that would dictate the activities of a single penis. Not for any cost-saving measure nor for an ideological one.

Yet my vagina and its related activities, even post-traumatic ones, never fall far from legislative view. If only this same dedication were paid to efforts to ensure tranquil global relations, solid schools, safe communities or good, equal paying jobs—you know, actual issues that need our attention. Then maybe we could see a stronger economy emerge. After all, how can you subjugate more than half the population—pay them less, restrict access to healthcare and force potential physical, psychological and financial duress upon them—and expect good results? As one noted politician aptly stated, it’s called “arithmetic.”

Regardless of the flowery talk, the most cohesive “job” that seemed to emerge lately have been efforts to clamp down on every uterus bearer in America, on a host of fronts. When a hostile minority rules the majority, it’s a form of apartheid. The most egregious form of that was dismantled in South Africa back in the 1990s. I’m not hip on codifying a new form here. No one should be.

But by not coming out to vote, we would give tacit approval to said oppressive policies. Anyone willingly ceding that power is not only irresponsible, but also culpable for those infractions. Since chicks slapping each other—even if it is to wake them up—feeds into another kind of deviant fantasy, I refrain. I use words instead.

Nia Ngina Meeks is a Philadelphia-based writer and political analyst. Follow her on Twitter @nmpurpose.

Leave Our Rights Alone —There Are Much Bigger Issues to Tackle
By Linda Vertlieb

When I was asked the question of how this election has made me feel and what my perspective was as a female voter, it made me take a step back. As the wife of a veteran in the working class, I’ve been focusing on the bigger issues that affect my husband, our family and our financial futures. I want to know that my husband will be taken care of for serving our country. I want my children to be able to afford to go to college, and most importantly, I’m worried about our economy. Issues that address women should come after that. I don’t think I’m alone in thinking this.

It’s easy to forget how far we’ve come in women’s rights. Here we are, having to decide between two male candidates to make decisions on women’s issues. But that’s nothing new. Of course, any issue that affects me as a woman is important to me; I believe in gender equality and women’s health issues and rights. However, I feel that tackling the bigger picture of repairing our economy and creating jobs will consequently benefit everyone.

This election isn’t only about the presidential candidates. There is a lot going on locally that we should all care about. As the wife of Philadelphia firefighter and resident of Philadelphia, it is important for me to be aware of the ballot questions being asked on Election Day. How we vote on them will affect us in one way or the other. One major question being asked is if the city should borrow $123,670,000 to put toward transit, streets and sanitation, municipal buildings, parks, recreation and museums. They are all things our city needs, but at the end of the day, we the taxpayers will have to pay for it. This is a serious question to consider when you enter the voting booth. Either way, we’ll have to pay or deal with cutbacks.

Overall, this election has been overwhelming, to say the least. It’s much different this time around, with everyone sharing their opinions all over social media; there’s no hiding from it. I’m not one to ever comment on politics. It doesn’t mean I don’t have an opinion or that I don’t care. My opinions are my own and I respect the opinions of others. I just feel it’s extremely important to be educated on the issues regardless of which candidate you are voting for. Get out there on Nov. 6 and vote!

Linda Vertlieb runs

An Open Letter to the Honorable Willard Mitt Romney, Former Governor of Mass.
By Kishwer Vikaas

Dear Governor Romney,

I am not a slut.

In February 2012, Democrats invited Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke to testify to a House committee about the importance of requiring insurance plans to cover contraceptives. Fluke and her fellow female students, 40 percent of the school’s population, were denied coverage for contraceptives by the Catholic school’s health insurance plan. But Republican members of the House refused to allow her to talk about her experience, saying she was not “qualified”—despite the fact that Fluke was the only woman set to testify at that particular hearing.

After she was finally given the chance to speak at an event arranged by House Democrats, she was vilified by talk-show host Rush Limbaugh and labeled a “slut.”

Like Fluke, I too am a law student in my final year of school. And while I attend a public university whose insurance plan covers contraceptives, I vividly recall the pains of aging out of my mother’s health insurance plan before President Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ever existed.

In the years between graduating from college and getting our first real jobs, my girlfriends and I struggled to minimize our expenses. Frankly, if it weren’t for Planned Parenthood, which offered us low-cost contraception alternatives, we would probably not be where we are now—working as grad students and professionals.

Prev| Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |Next
Add to favoritesAdd to Favorites PrintPrint Send to friendSend to Friend


Comments 1 - 6 of 6
Report Violation

1. Anonymous said... on Oct 31, 2012 at 01:43PM

“It was not President Obama who said that "he got a binder full of women", so why is your comment directed towards him (Remember the 2008 election. Yeah that was us . Mr. Obama)? Our president knows who voted for him!!! You should fix this!!!”

Report Violation

2. Nina Hoffmann said... on Oct 31, 2012 at 01:52PM

“Hi Anonymous, thank you for your comment. We know that Obama had nothing to do with the "binders" gaffe. Not sure how you've made that connection, but that line is in reference to the fact that in 2008, women voted in large numbers and were a major factor in getting Obama elected.

Nina Hoffmann
Senior Editor
Philadelphia Weekly”

Report Violation

3. Anonymous said... on Oct 31, 2012 at 03:52PM

“Wow your article just goes to re-afirm that Obama and his followers want socialism. Give me my free shit!!
Funny at the bottom of the screen on page 5 is an ad to contribute to the Romney campaign. I guess PW needs the money!!”

Report Violation

4. Cindy Davis said... on Nov 1, 2012 at 06:58PM

“Socialism? Give me my free shit??? Are you kidding me? Spoken like a true man. Damn, I wish we could give men's bodies the ability to conceive. Then we would see a whole new discussion when it came to unwanted or unplanned pregnancies.

Report Violation

5. Anonymous said... on Nov 6, 2012 at 06:43PM

“Pres. Obama loves to talk about how the rich don't pay their “fair share,” and how corrupt and evil his opponents are. He smugly barks out condemnation for cronyism and “obscene profits,” and he calls Gov. Mitt Romney a “bullsh-----.” Let's look at how Obama himself acts.

Apparently based on nothing more than an unsubstantiated claim by Harry Reid that Romney had paid no federal income taxes for 10 years, an ad approved by Obama (who laments the lack of decency in politics) asks, “Did Romney pay 0% in taxes?” A strange suggestion coming from a guy who appointed at least two people who we know had failed to pay owed taxes. One of them is Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Just before becoming head of the agency that oversees the IRS, he finally paid the last of his back taxes from six years earlier.

But just when you thought Obama's attack on Romney couldn't get any more hypocritical, it also comes from a guy who, with the world's fourth-richest man, billionaire Warren Buffet, has”

Report Violation

6. Betty Anne Pauly said... on Nov 13, 2012 at 06:25PM

“Cindy Davis....I always said, if men could get pregnant, then abortion would be a sacrament!”


(HTML and URLs prohibited)

Related Content

PW's Quick & Easy Voters Guide for Tuesday, Nov. 6
By PW Staff

You do not need identification to vote on Tuesday, Nov. 6. We repeat: You do not need identification to vote.

Related Content

6 Memorable Tweets About Women's Reproductive Rights
By Annamarya Scaccia

Let’s face it—the last year has been hell for women. The fight to keep reproductive choice intact was fiercer than ever before. It’s a mess, to put it mildly. But what do locals have to say about it? PW rounded up the six most memorable tweets from 2012 to give you an idea.