Judge Jeffrey Minehart Hammers Down

A magistrate drops the in a disorderly court.

By F.H. Rubino
Add Comment Add Comment | Comments: 6 | Posted Jan. 19, 2010

Share this Story:

Fast-forwarding to Ali, Minehart has instituted a gag order, forbidding any involved parties from speaking with reporters. Presumably, the judge hopes he won’t have to gag anyone literally. ■

Prev| Page: 1 2
Add to favoritesAdd to Favorites PrintPrint Send to friendSend to Friend

COMMENTS

Comments 1 - 6 of 6
Report Violation

1. LEONETTE ROWE said... on May 5, 2010 at 10:09AM

“I REALLY NEED TO SPEAK WITH YOU EITHER BY E-MAIL OR BY PHONE
THIS IS A MATTER CONCERNING A YOUNG MAN THAT IS TO STAND BEFORE YOU ON MAY 21,2010. YOU HAVE ALREADY TOLD HIS LAWYER THAT YOPU WILL NOT HEAR OF ANY NEW EVIDENCE OR ANY-THING CONCERNING THIS CASE, BUT AS HIS AUNT ( HIAS MOTHER, MY SISTER IS ILL WITH BLADDER CANCER ) AM PLEADING WITH YOU TO JUST HEAR THE EVIDENCE THAT WAS OVER LOOKED BY THE OTHER JUDGE THAT PRESIDED OVER THE INITIAL TRIAL THAT SENT HIM TO PRISON IN THE FIRST PLACE. THERE WAS AN INVESTIGATOR (WHOSE EVIDENCE WAS NOT EVEN ENTERED) THIS ALONG WITH OTHER COMMON SENSE THINGS, ARE WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS CASE. THE EVIDENCE WAS HEAR- SAY, BY A YOUNG MAN WHO WAS HIGH AT THE TIME OF HIS TESTIMONY. I PLEAD WITH YOU ON THE HONOR OF THE OATH YOU TOOK TO AT LEAST CALL ME OR E-MAIL ME BACK TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER OF GRAVE IMPORTANCE. I KNOW YOU WILL DO THE RIGHT THING IN THIS MATTER, AND AFTER TALKING TO ME, IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ANYTHING PRESENTED TOYOU, I WILL DEFEAT.

Report Violation

2. LEONETTE ROWE said... on May 5, 2010 at 10:15AM

“I AM SORRY THAT I DIDN'T INCLUDE MY PHONE NUMBER IN THE LAST E-MAIL, BUT THE URGENCY STILL REMAINS: 215-257-5773. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR ALL OF YOU HELP, AND IF YOU JUST READ THE E-MAILAND DECIDED AGAINST GOING ANY FURTHER, PLEASE LET ME KNOW THAT AS WELL.”

Report Violation

3. Anonymous said... on Nov 24, 2011 at 06:06AM

“Find counsel who will file a Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA") action for the convicted.”

Report Violation

4. Iamdana said... on May 19, 2012 at 11:17PM

“Judge Minert may very well be one of the better judges, however his actions and rulings go against the law. Gagging that Canady was abuse on this Judges part, and when he says life means life thats not true either because I am pretty sure there was a 13 year old girl(the booth case) that shot and killed her father.......she got probation. Its just so sad that untruthful statements can be made and yet when looking at the record one can clearly see that the life means life statement is not true and only holds true to those who in the courts eyes are deserving of probation instead of the law thats on the books.”

Report Violation

5. Anonymous said... on Jun 15, 2012 at 05:10PM

“The case of ali, the one that killed two loomis guards was a joke this guy ali should have been given the death penalty. take one life i can see life in jail, take two lives and this should have been given the lethal injection. the judge on this case needs to retire and hold his head down in shame for the rest of his life.”

Report Violation

6. Anonymous said... on Jun 4, 2013 at 07:22AM

“The Judge does not decide the death penalty it is the jury, get your facts straight! If the jury can not decide the judge gives life without parole. That is the law! The defendant was black, the jury had 6 black females on it, not tough to figure out why no death penalty was given!”

ADD COMMENT

Rate:
(HTML and URLs prohibited)