Attorney General Candidates Patrick Murphy and Kathleen Kane Battle in the Democratic Primary

By Michael Alan Goldberg
Add Comment Add Comment | Comments: 5 | Posted Apr. 18, 2012

Share this Story:

Ever since Pennsylvania began electing its attorneys general in 1980, exactly zero Democrats have held the post. Republican candidates have historically been excellent at portraying themselves as tough-on-crime prosecutors (and their Democratic rivals as spineless). Heading into November, yet another formidable Republican—no-nonsense Cumberland County District Attorney David Freed, who’s running unopposed in next week’s primary—will try to make mincemeat out of either Kathleen Kane or Patrick Murphy, the two Democrats sparring fiercely in a primary bout to determine who’ll carry their party’s flag in the AG race this fall.

With Freed sharpening his rhetorical knives for battle, and history working against them, Kane and Murphy—though they essentially agree on many key issues—have starkly different ideas on what makes each more electable than the other come November.

The Scranton-born Kane, a graduate of Temple’s law school, is banking entirely on her impressive courtroom credentials to convince voters she’s as tough on the bad guys as Freed or anyone else. An assistant D.A. in Lackawanna County from 1995 to 2007, Kane began her career relentlessly prosecuting child abusers, sex offenders and child pornographers (in a post-Sandusky world, such experience, she has said, demonstrates her zeal in going after individuals—and institutions—involved in sexual assaults and related crimes). She then moved on to putting murderers, corrupt judges and white-collar criminals behind bars; heading up the county’s Insurance Fraud Task Force; and specializing in cases involving elder abuse and domestic violence.

Kane’s campaign mantra has been “A prosecutor, not a politician”—a swipe at Northeast Philly native Murphy, formerly a two-term U.S. representative from Bucks County (from 2007 to 2011). Kane’s camp has correctly pointed out that Murphy never took the Pennsylvania bar exam and hasn’t tried a case in a Pennsylvania courtroom. Murphy passed the Minnesota bar exam and because of that plus his five years as an Army lawyer, he was admitted to the Pennsylvania bar.

Murphy argues that his prosecutorial credentials are just as solid as Kane’s, having tried numerous cases in military courts during the Iraq War (while serving with the 82nd Airborne) and at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. And he has embraced the politician tag, reasoning that as attorney general his moderate-Democrat leanings and his well-honed political savvy would provide a strong “counterbalance” to Gov. Corbett and a state legislature moving even further to the right. (Perhaps it’s a smart play, considering Corbett’s recently plummeting approval rating.) For example, Murphy has stated that if the highly controversial transvaginal ultrasound bill were to become law, as AG he would not enforce it. (Kane, who also vehemently opposes the bill, stopped short of saying she wouldn’t enforce it.) “Some people see the Attorney General as nothing more than the Commonwealth’s top lawyer,” Murphy says on his campaign website. “I see it differently. I believe the office can be more.”

 But if Murphy is casting Kane as someone who lacks a grander vision for the job and the political savvy or will to stand up to Corbett, her positions on major issues—which more or less mirror Murphy’s—suggest she would be equally positioned as a counterbalance. Unlike the governor and an increasingly pro-gun general assembly, both Kane and Murphy are staunch gun-control advocates. They support closing the “Florida Loophole,” which allows individuals who’ve been denied concealed-carry permits in Pennsylvania to use permits obtained in other states, such as Florida (though as a congressman, Murphy co-sponsored failed legislation that would have taken away the Pennsylvania attorney general’s current powers to negotiate or rescind such gun-permit reciprocity agreements with other states).

Both are adamant that they’ll protect women’s reproductive rights and expand civil-rights protections for LGBT citizens. And both say they’ll aggressively enforce regulations on Marcellus Shale drillers and put a bigger premium on protecting the environment and the state’s drinking water than Corbett has thus far.

For her part, by labeling Murphy a “politician,” Kane isn’t simply trying to minimize his prosecutorial standing but also slyly raise the idea that Murphy might be looking ahead to a run for higher state office and intends to use the AG post as a springboard toward those ambitions. (Indeed, that’s a traditional play in Pennsylvania politics, as many AGs have sought higher office in the middle of their terms.) To demonstrate she has no such desires, Kane has pledged to serve two full four-year terms as AG (if elected, then re-elected), plus sit out two years beyond that, before seeking another office, all in the name of eliminating mid-term campaigning or the possibility of politically motivated prosecutions. So far, Murphy has committed to serving one full four-year term if elected and won’t discuss what might happen in a possible second term.

Whether or not that qualifies as part of the political sideshow, the recent game of endorsement one-upsmanship certainly does. After Murphy snagged endorsements from former Gov. Rendell, Mayor Nutter, the Philadelphia Fraternal Order of Police, the state’s Teamsters, and dozens more elected officials, Democratic party leaders and labor leaders throughout the state, Kane got the backing of the biggest name of all: Bill Clinton. The former president visited Upper Moreland High School last week to stump for Kane. “Kathleen Kane is the most experienced and qualified candidate to serve as Pennsylvania Attorney General,” he gushed. Of course, Kane was the Northeast PA Regional Volunteer Coordinator for Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, and Murphy supported Barack Obama during the 2008 primaries. So there’s that.

But whichever Democrat wins next week—and right now, Murphy’s name recognition and political clout seems to be giving him an edge over Kane’s prosecutorial experience and outsider stance—he or she is in for an exceedingly tough fight against Freed in the fall in their quest to make Pennsylvania election history.

Add to favoritesAdd to Favorites PrintPrint Send to friendSend to Friend


Comments 1 - 5 of 5
Report Violation

1. Cass said... on Apr 18, 2012 at 09:21AM

“Just curious, when did Kane state that she'll defend abortion and LGBT rights? I've been trying to figure out her stance on these issues, but the closest I could find on her website states that she'll "ensure equal protection for everyone" especially for veterans and the elderly. I was getting the impression she's more worried about making these issues not an issue at least for the duration of the election.”

Report Violation

2. MAG said... on Apr 18, 2012 at 09:35AM

“Some good clips here from a recent Kane-Murphy debate (particularly question 1-3) which should answer your question: Attorney General Debate 2012”

Report Violation

3. Anonymous said... on Apr 19, 2012 at 10:20AM

“Did Pat pass the bar exsam in PA yet???? His pretend catholicism is my reason for my not voting for him. Believe what you choose, Pat, but have the courage to leave the Church for which you show ignorance and contempt. I for one would respect you and perhaps vote for you.”

Report Violation

4. Anonymous said... on Apr 22, 2012 at 11:26AM

“Kane may be a decent prosecutor, and she may show the ethics in a courtroom that you would want as your Attorney General. However her company Kane is Able has a horrible track record in the way they treat employees who happen to be middle class working families. Knowing that whoever wins this race will eventually be moving on to higher office, I can't help but think she would hurt a lot of middle class families the same way Corbett has.”

Report Violation

5. Anonymous said... on Sep 22, 2012 at 12:54AM

“Too bad she lied about her record.

Once again a Dem will be taken down by their own lies and record.”


(HTML and URLs prohibited)

Related Content

Why the Gayborhood Vote Is So Important to the 182nd District
By Tara Murtha

The hottest race in the city for a seat in the state Legislature is going down in the 182nd District, which comprises a chunk of Center City, Logan Square and sections of Fairmount, Washington Square West, Bella Vista, Gray’s Ferry and—where the campaign rhetoric is at its most intense—the Gayborhood.

Related Content

Why You Should Care About These Primary Challenges
By Michael Alan Goldberg

From hot dog vendor to Pennsylvania state senator to ex-con to Philly mayoral challenger to ... Harrisburg again? It could happen, if ever-tenacious 72-year-old Milton Street claims victory in this odd race to fill the state House seat—encompassing a wide swath of North Philly—which Jewell Williams vacated last year to successfully run for Philadelphia sheriff.

Related Content

The Rise and Fall, Again, of Rick Santorum's Political Ambition
By Randy LoBasso

Everyone remembers the photo from 2006, when Rick Santorum had to stand up and acknowledge he’d been voted out of the U.S. Senate by the people of Pennsylvania. While Santorum spoke, his 8-year-old daughter Sarah Maria stood next to him, her chubby cheeks soaked with tears. It was the picture of the end of the Republican Revolution that, for a decade, had ruled Congress, and thus Washington, and thus America.