Would the devout Catholic still be Newt’s mistress today if the second Mrs. Gingrich had agreed to remain in the marriage that Newt had already opened?
This news alters the redemption narrative that the Gingrich camp set before the voters. So questioning Callista about the open marriage proposal—what did the mistress know and when did she know it?—seems like an entirely legit line of inquiry to me.
Callista Gingrich, like her vile husband, doesn’t believe that gays and lesbians should be equal under the law because, as a good Catholic, she believes that homosexuality is a sin and that homosexuals should remain celibate. Well, the Catholic Church considers adultery, divorce and birth control sinful, too. Someone in the liberal media really ought to ask Callista to explain why her faith should place limits on my sexual expression but not her own.
Article:
Ben Franklin has an opinion on the NSA surveillance scandal
Article:
Savage Love
Article:
'Doing the Best I Can' talks with poor urban dads about unwed fatherhood
Article:
Savage Love
Article:
Letters to the Editor
Article:
Savage Love
Article:
Savage Love
Article:
Letters to the Editor
1. Anonymous said... on Jan 25, 2012 at 11:51AM
“Nice rant about Callista Gingrich, especially "Someone in the liberal media really ought to ask Callista to explain why her faith..." But, no one of any importance actually has the balls to ask that question out loud. That's one of our problems: no one of any importance asks the right questions.”